“Could it be that Obama's recession and economic stagnation -- and even his socialism -- are truly self-perpetuating? That the more he ruins our economy, the larger the base of government-dependent voters? Could this motivation have played a part in his adoption of policies that he might have known would lead to economic failure? Could it all be deliberate?”

--D*** Morris

Looks as if one right wing pundit is catching on.

Sounds mad but the truth is that everything has been calculated to accomplish two things. 1) Dependency on government as “discovered” by Morris and 2) the transfer of wealth. The second SHOULB BE covered by Romney, but it hasn’t been properly framed.

The debt burden is a deliberate calculation by Obama’s thinkers (don’t include him; he’s a functional idiot) because money owed by the borrower to the lender is transfer of wealth. In this case from the U.S to foreign debt holders (eg, China). As Obama told Joe the Plumber, he favors the redistribution of wealth so everything he has done and intends to do is calculated to transfer wealth…from the richer to the poorer… from the private sector to the public sector…from the U.S. to China and other debt holders.

And in his second term he intends to transfer technology to the Russians. “I will have more flexibility after I am reelected.” They must celebrating even now.

That is why he is a TRAITOR along with anyone who votes from him. One out of every two persons that you see on the street is a TRAITOR to themselves, to you, to their children, and the U.S. of America.

Some are too stupid to know it; others are not. Romney’s potential base is to educate the stupid correctly and that would be a definite win because there are more people who are stupid than not.

After all, how else did we get into this mess?