Undoubtedly, America has in place, the furthest "left" administration we have seen in our lifetime. The White House is filled with lobbyist and donors, Chicago era politicians, new Czars are being appointed with great frequency, and is the most extreme "Wall Street" administration seen to date. How did this happen?

It is my opinion, that America's decline into Progressivism, has distorted the line between reality and ideology, corrupting the ideals and concepts of our values. The liberal aim is too defy and defeat the traditions that our Country was built upon. Let me make a case to illustrate the extremes between the thought process of the conservative and the progressive minded: If I ask YOU what kind of a leader would you fight for, George Washington or Barrack H Obama, what would you say? Before you answer that, let me give you a hint incase you are one of the ones whose views are distored by fiction.

Fighting for George Washington, the forefather of our great Nation, meant that YOU would be rallying for a Country you could call your own...The Land of the free, the Land of the brave. George Washington won the affection of his Countrymen, and led his peoples to the defeat of the British against ALL odds, to give us the Country we live in today. I don't know of any greater achievement than that - just ask all the peoples who migrate to America, forsaking their own homelands for the slice of the "American pie".

If you say you prefer fighting for Barrack H Obama, then my question would be, "for what would you be fighting for?" See the difference? So, how the liberal would answer that is obvious, but why? Because the Liberal is all about "change" THEY can believe in...not "change" WE can believe in. Even if the "change" means a total facelift to our economic, political, and social values as they see fit. They (the Liberal) simply cannot make a great case for this argument, because to the average human being on this planet, there is no comparison between these two figures. Yet the Liberal will emphatically defend their position based on theoritical scenarios, versus a truth as factual as Einstein's theory of relativity. They cannot confront and acknowledge truth because truth defeats their ideologies.

By now, it is apparent the direction our Government is leading us. Would George Washington obuse his power to decieve the peoples of our Country by making every effort to bankrupt our Nation? Would he lie to the people "rushing" bills through Congress in order to prevent careful inspection of the contents of those bills? Would he break EVERY campain promise he made to his loyal followers, who elected him to power? Would he expand Government at the expense of the taxpayer, while declaring whats "good for us"?? Again, who would actually argue this? A Liberal! Let me continue.

Barrack H Obama is an extreme version of George W Bush. Ask the Liberal if they can point out the difference between the two. A normal person would find it next to impossible to make that argument minus his spending habits. The Liberal will "whip" up some rhetoric, "pulled from their asses", just to avoid the recognition of the truth they deeply despise. They casted their vote for Obama because they championed him as a "Progressive" Liberal, that would represent their fanatical fantasies, and was duped, just as the conservatives where when they elected Bush.

It's Bush all over again, times ten. Its the same thing we had for the "We can't afford four more years of the last eight" era. Troops are still fighting in Iraq, and commited to fight for the next 16 to 23 months, the last I checked. Obama even commited 30k more troops to Afganistan. Obama reauthorized and legalized the Patriot Act, which the Liberals hated under the Bush Administration. The idea of the closing of Gitmo was shot down by Congress, and pot is still illegal, gay communities still outraged, and unemployment is steadily rising even when he promised it wouldn't go above 8% before his innauguration. How could anyone, with any once of sanity, make a good argument in defense of their loyality for their favored "champion of hope and change". Well, the Liberal can, simply by manipulating the evidense of their own eyes. A normal person would not do this. A normal person would be outraged by the lies and deciet seen SO FAR from their elected official of their preference. It doesn't take us to have wait for four years to evaluate his performance. By now you should have a clear idea of the direction he is trying to lead us to. So please don't tell me "give it more time". That BS does not belong in the point of my argument.

The liberal defies traditional values because they can't "fit in". As a minority, they want to exact their outrage against those they feel they can't "connect" with. This is the crux of the Liberal mindset. They can't fight their cause head on, so they use rhetoric to wage their "wars".

The Liberal is uniquely different in thought and ideal from that of their conservative "opposition". The Conservative despise collectivisim, while championing the idea of individual pursuit. To the "Conservative", everyone has their own responsibility to prosper in life, and their sucesses are only limited by their own convictions. For the Liberal, THEY decide, who doesn't measure up, and then try to make it everyone elses problem to correct it. They site that, not every individual has the ability to prosper, and supposes that Government should make special accomodations, at the expense of the taxpayer, to those THEY define as minorities. And ofcourse those "supposed" minorities love them....the Liberals. And the minorities are always just that..."minorities", because they, generation by generation, grow a dependence on these fanatical ideologues to "steer their ships" for them, rather than orchestrating their own prosperty. These types of attitudes is damaging to our society because, over time, people become enslaved by the ideas the Liberal fanatic institutes into the fabric of our consciesnousness. I believe in "United We Stand"...they believe in "United THEY stand". And guess who "They" is? I'll give you a hint: Its not the "majority".

The liberals are experts at perpetuating fiction, and using it to disturb the natural balance of reality. This is why you are more likely to hear the Liberal referred to as "ideologues". The only exception, to be fair, is that Religious people, can also be recognized as ideologues, from the viewpoint of the "Darwinian" Liberal. I will not introduce religion into my argument because I cannot prove the existance of God, anymore than the Liberal can disprove it.

The liberal is a myth pepeutating machine, and they have honed their craft with fantastic results. In order for the Liberal to survive as a breed, they must invent "problems" that they can politicize and make people believe is not only real, but is deserving of everyone's effort to solve. The idea of charity is a fierce opponent to the Liberal. Charity is what people engage in when they want to contribute to a cause, which only involves individual commitment to do. The Liberal replaces "Charity" with "Obligatory contribution", which is really.....TA DAH: "Taxes"! We need to raise taxes to fund "THEIR" special programs in support of.....TA DAH: "minorities", whether it be people, animal, land, or concept. According to THEIR view, once again, it is the problem of EVERYONE to solve...more of that "United THEY Stand" crap all over again.

Another example is Global Warming. This would be public enemy number two, only second to "political correctness". This is the biggest and cruelest hoax their myth machine has invented to date. The idea of Global Warming is NO more proven than the "Big Bang" theory. Thousands of scientists, ecocoligists, and weather experts have consistently "debunked" those theories for years. Yet, for this fantastic piece of nonsense, Global Warming justifies "Cap and Trade", and the insitution of new taxes under the umbrella of curbing "carbon emissions". And who pays once again? I don't actually have to answer that do I??

Political correctness. The aim here is pretty clear. Suppress speech, and thought control, is the order of its design. That dictionary grows in volume year by year, and stifles individual freedom of expression. It makes people PAY for not "playing" by THEIR rules. Its another way that the liberal exacts their vengeance against those they cannot "fit in" with. I utterly reject this ritual, and take a fierce position against it. How? By speaking my mind, something the constution was designed to protect. Unfortunately, people of political, religous, and corporate business persuasions, cannot overcome this without a "price". Again, the liberal machine, is about subtly driving traditional values out the window, to be replaced by their self indulgent effections for control over the people they hate.

The liberal resembles barbariansim, from my point of view. They tout themselves as "progressive", yet everything they think and do is actually "regressive". They find ways, with the support of the "ACLU", to defend teenage "sexting", and in Rhode Island they have 16 year old girls that are allowed to work as strippers until 11:30 pm at night! Liberal judges, assign petty sentences to child molestors (think Vermont and Oklahoma), they hold candlelight vigils for mass murderers who are about to be sent to the "chair", they make excuses for criminals, try to ban second right amendments, demand civil rights for illegal immigrants, champion abortion, burn american flags, and guess why we need parental control mechanisms for the web and especially TV?? How did we elvolve into a culture that finds entertainment value in "John and Kate plus Eight"?!? You can't flip one channel without running into sex, drugs, violence, and filthy language". This is progress I dare ask??

Truth be told, the liberal could care less about the government trying to engineer their brand of socialism. Purposely trying to bankrupt our nation to set up their global agendas, expanding the government, cramming down our throats a notoriously failed brand of government health care reform (as observed from numerous other Countries who had government funded health care), and other atrocities seen so far. The liberal's only interest, is to have anything in power, even if obviously bad, just to avoid the possibility of a conservative or even moderate oriented government.

Fortunately, the Liberal always pushes the envolope too far, AND to quickly, when they get into any kind of Public office. The Obama agenda is very clear because they try to do too much, and FAR too quickly. Obama's rating continues to plummet, and he is getting resistance from many in his own party because too many Americans are visibly outraged by their direction.

If you alledge that I am bitter, you are incorrect in your asessment. I am livid, AND, I am obviously not the only who is. My discontent for the Liberal grows with increasing foracity, not because I don't understand them, but because I DO understand them. I understand them very well, which precisely supports my arguments. I avoid anyone who heralds rhetoric over common sense realities. I eschew those that "demonize" me just because I eat meat, chop wood, or fill my tank with gasoline. I am anti everything that the liberal stands for. Anti-Gay, Anti-Union, Anti-GreenPeace, Anti-Abortion, Anti-PETA, Anti-Hollywood, Anti-Socialist, Anti-20 lb Plastic Vehicle that uses electricity for power, Anti-Sharing, Nurturing, and Bonding, Anti-Big Government, and Anti-Community Organizing. In my opinion, the only thing you to need to be a "Pro" of is "Pro-Self", "Pro Family", and "Pro-God".

A lot of Liberals, who might read this, will instantly accuse me of being a "Hate Monger". I don't know what that means. Oh wait...here it is: http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=hate+monger
But the liberal, will irresponsibly label me as such, when all the while, I had never said I hated anyone. I hate the idea not the person. To say I personally hate everyone who happens to be a liberal would be ludicrous. You have to know someone personally before you can commit to hatred towards him (or eh her). Obviously I don't know every single liberal in our Nation. BUT...I do know their thought process, which is what I do hate. Its good to have your own ideas, its bad to force upon your ideas on others. I don't mind the Liberal for having their own fantasies, I do mind when they try to turn their fantasies into a reality that people have to abide by.

I will leave my argument with a very accurate qoute by Robert Frost: "A liberal is a man too broad-minded to take his own side in a quarrel"