social network for conservatives
Th real difference between Mitt and Newt....
when Mitt got political power he built a moderate record to get along with democrats...
(thus the excuses/flips)
when Newt got political power he built a conservative record 2nd to none despite a "slick" democrat president...
(90% lifetime conservative rating)
AND WHAT UPSET THE DEMS THE MOST LAST NITE???
The most offensive part of last nite's debate (to the secular socialist utopians) has to be the times
Indeed Doug. we need a monster to bring down the ego of obama...and newt matches the ego part. plus he is smart as all heck! Mitt is a seemingly good and kind man, tooooooooooooooo kind, ITS time we get serious and understand that obama is a mean alinsky MARXIST. He does NOT even recognize the Constitution.We need strong and fearless and ready to keep America safe and honorable and STRONG!
Well, Ester, that smart as heck politico isn't polling well in Florida 48-hours before Tuesday's primary. I'm not a Romney fan by any stretch of the imagination; I'm also not a fan of a man who would have affairs on a dying wife either.
There are no family values or sanctity of marriage in those actions.
When conservatives talk about throwing the bums out, we can't conveniently throw our own personal values out too when electing replacements.
Thats TOO BAD Roger as the others WILL NEVER BEAT the OBUM.
I am giving no seal of approval to anyones moral misdeeds ...I want the man the MACHINE in politics doesnt want........................WE DONT need a Romeny as he is JUST WHAT THE LIBS WANT and are laughing about NOW as we speak. HE WOULD BE MINCE MEAT TO OBAMA!
Ester, have you forgotten that Mr. Gingrich left his Speaker position is shame because of ethics violations?
Currently, there are four men running for the POTUS position from the GOP - it's not down to two as you're suggesting.
Roger Roger ROGER............I most certainly am aware of 4 canidates. Ron Paul ? NO! end.
I would Santorum in a second, but his social vews. which btw I share will kill him w.voters. As Americans as a whole have turned into selfish and indulgent humans whos overall vew of a tooooooooooooo Christian persons w.strong values ...BTW have you ever heard of Synergey Corp out of Calif? This company w.OUT any govt restraints have taken aborted baby cells and added it to food prouducts. Google and than barf.........................For the past 2 years unbeknownst to us we have been drinking ALL Pepsi prouducts that have aborted baby cells in the sweetner...as Synergey states in it page. ITS just so much more a better TASTE! That is what we have succcomed to,. YES Caniballism.
As to Rommey and Newt? I am doing my best to hang w.the guy who has least baggage the libbers can attack.............ALL the WEALTH and now finding out he also has had accounts in 22 other countrys is just red meat for the OWS and the DEMS. To further show the GREAT EVIL RICH people in this nation are ...............do you get my point?
Rommney would make a very ATTRACTIVE canidate. physically and maybe w.some of his lib thinking in the past to some independents and athetists. MITT also does not seem to have a deep seated gutteral desire and it comes across in his speech and presentation.
I want a slap in the face canidate who shows he has intellect, drive, knowledge base of this economy and Americas History and will take down Obama and with a hard smack down.
................I PROMISE YOU if Mitt gets the nodd? HE LOOSES! Newt has a far better chance in my small humble opine. A MODERATE GOP CANIDATE we have tried. and we lost.. names Robert Dole and John McCain. And they had as much gut and drive in the race as a flea. it was pathetic. DO as you choose Roger and I will do as I choose................and YES any GOP canidate I WILL VOTE for
P S...as for leaving the speakership in SHAME? NAH his censorship was nothing in comparisons to a Barny Frank or Chris Dodd Rangel etc etc and I COULD go on WHO SHOULD HAVE BEEN DISMISSED W>TOTAL SHAME.. BTW 'Pelooose' is just a MEAN HATEFUL HAG! Well who is not carrying shame.? ANSWER me that aside from Santorum. I dont even include Paul...seems like a nice man WOULD NOT FEEL one bit safe w.that dude in the W House as to his pacifism I DO know about war and what it can do.....MY husband served Army during NAM he was a helo crew chief and instructor. LOST a beloved friend who was engaged to my cousin.and my husband lost many friends....and to make things even nicer on return? THESE men were spat upon..............dont get me started on that topic.... .MITT has plenty baggage and the ows would even say SHAME too as to all his monies and his machiactions of it will do him in!
Because Mr. Romney has a lot of money, you feel it is appropriate that his "money do him in?" Interesting. Are you against also capitalism and people working hard to earn money?
Of course NOT...tell that to Obama lovers and the general mass of idiots that live in this nation....he could have passed on the swiss bank and other foreign accounts, if only for appearances sake and not subject himself to the Libs rath.
He RUNS we LOOSE.....................either way ITS a goner Obama has a billion bucks and soros and we have Mitt and his millions and obama is the evil twin of Bill Mauer....so in conclusion we get 4 more years of obama.
Newt is my first choice...my business. yours is Mitt your business,
BTW have you ever heard of Synergey Corp out of Calif? This company w.OUT any govt restraints have taken aborted baby cells and added it to food prouducts. Google and than barf.........................For the past 2 years unbeknownst to us we have been drinking ALL Pepsi prouducts that have aborted baby cells in the sweetner...as Synergey states in it page. ITS just so much more a better TASTE! That is what we have succcomed to,. YES Caniballism.
First off, conservatism advocates for smaller government, not bigger, therefore, regulating companies is not within the GOP platform purview. It would be correct to boycott the company and it’s supporters as Children of God for Life have called for.
Secondly, the company of which you write is actually named Senomyx, not Synergey – which is a French denim jean company.
Third, the HEK 293 cell which Children of God for Life state is in Pepsi® cola products is actually the 293rd clone of an aborted fetus kidney from the 1970s and is for research purposes only. It is one of the embryonic cell lines approved by the FDA. This doesn’t mean that aborted fetuses continue to be harvested for this one cell. This means that one aborted fetus donated this cell in the 1970s and researchers all use clones of this one aborted fetus cell from the 1970s.
Through bioresearch, Senomyx has essentially reverse engineered the receptors in the human tongue that react for taste and aroma, and they are capitalizing on these discoveries to produce factors such as tricking receptors to think that a product is actually sweeter than it is in order to reduce the amount of sugar a product contains thereby improving the overall nutritional value of the product.
Fourth, Senomyx published their research paper in 2002. This information has been around longer than two years.
You seem all wise and knowing why bother me?
Pepsi has had BUT a a 4 year contract w.S company thus its been 2 years that Pepsi products are involved.
Glad to hear your so well versed. As per the mispell of of the name YOU did know what I was referencing. Thus you enlightened.
I have involvement in many and varied groups and as you which is apparent do nhave the leisure of being on top of THINGS soooooooooooooooooooo GO ROGER!
As per the mispell of of the name YOU did know what I was referencing.
No, actually, I had to take key phrases of what you said and enter it into Google®. I had no idea that Senomyx even existed until last night. I had no idea the HEK 293 existed until last night. I had no idea that Children of God for Life existed until last night.
A simple hour of doing research is all it took for me to write the post. It doesn't take long to clearly and verify facts before putting out information.
Just so that you know, a U.S. District Court ruled recently that a blogger wasn't a journalist and therefore couldn't hide behind "shield laws."
I'd think carefully about defaming and libeling two American corporations on the Internet - may cost you some hefty legal defense monies.