TCUnation
social network for conservatives
New Gets Worse for Obama- Judge Carter Grants Expedited Discovery in Eligibilty Case
Judge David Carter has granted Orly Taitz expedited discovery immediately in the Obama eligiblty case, this will allow her to subpoena Obama's birth records and pertinent information and evidence regarding his place of birth and citizenship status. This is from a Jeff Schwilk, the
founder of San Diego Minutemen, in a report on stopxspp.com
founder of San Diego Minutemen, in a report on stopxspp.com
Replies to This Discussion
-
Permalink Reply by Stingray SFO (3% Oath Keeper) on
-
This has been confirmed! Also, a case in Georgia is moving forward, and now verified evidence of Pelosi's involvement and complicity in election fraud has been discovered! TWO certification statement documents for vetting Obama's nomination to the DNC are now public, both notarized, both signed by Pelosi and the DNC secretary! The one that had the phrase 'as required under the constitution' REMOVED was the one used for presentation to the DNC and all 50 states for vetting his eligibility!
It's time to FORCE AG Holder to bring charges of election fraud and treason against Pelosi and all who assisted her in this fraud against the American people!
-
Permalink Reply by Danney Lawler on -
If the judge has ordered immediate discovery that is huge. That means Obama is compelled by court order to show everything. He must answer the inquiry or suffer rule 4:23 of the federal rule of civil proceedure.
(a) Failure to Be Sworn or Answer a Question. If a deponent fails to be sworn or to answer a question after being directed to do so, the failure may be considered a contempt of that court.
(b) Other Matters. If a party or an officer, director, or managing or authorized agent of a party or a person designated under R. 4:14-2(c) or 4:15-1 to testify on behalf of a party fails to obey an order to provide or permit discovery, including an order made under R. 4:23-1, the court in which the action is pending may make such orders in regard to the failure as are just, and among others the following:
(1) An order that the matters regarding which the order was made or any other designated facts shall be taken to be established for the purposes of the action in accordance with the claim of the party obtaining the order;
(2) An order refusing to allow the disobedient party to support or oppose designated claims or defenses, or prohibiting the introduction of designated matters in evidence;
(3) An order striking out pleadings or parts thereof, or staying further proceedings until the order is obeyed, or dismissing the action or proceeding or any part thereof with or without prejudice, or rendering a judgment by default against the disobedient party;
(4) In lieu of any of the foregoing orders or in addition thereto, an order treating as a contempt of court the failure to obey any orders.
© 2013 Created by Earl B.
