TCUnation
social network for conservatives
TSA, Controlling Our Freedom to Travel Anywhere, Anytime.
I Do Hope that everyone will not only read this but consider the worst part of this "Control of All People' by the TSA. moving toward the USSR of America.
They will be able to control your Freedom to travel by Air any where in America or the World, just like Russians in Russia, a Chinese in China, N Koreans in Korea, Muslims in all Muslim Nations, ETC.
THINK ABOUT IT! ! ! Next will TSA be used to Control all Ground Travel, using the same excuse, the detection of Terrorists? ? ?
TSGT Clough
ACT FOR AMERICA
In WorldNetDaily interview, Brigitte Gabriel addresses controversy over full-body scanners and pat downs
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
RAGE AGAINST THE MACHINES
Expert: TSA scans would let al-Qaida duplicate 9/11
Brigitte Gabriel warns unless U.S. starts profiling, nation is vulnerable
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Posted: November 18, 2010
12:10 am Eastern
By Bob Unruh
© 2010 WorldNetDaily
http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=229613
Brigitte Gabriel
A terrorism expert says the invasive screening procedures demanded by the Obama-run Transportation Security Administration would do almost nothing to stop a determined terrorist because they already are experimenting with inserting explosives in a body cavity or even surgically implanting the destructive charges.
The comments come from Brigitte Gabriel, who is the founder of Act! For America, a 150,000-strong group that works to warn Americans against the dangers of militant Islam and the Muslims who follow it.
She also is a member of the board of advisers for the Intelligence Summit, and she lectures internationally on global terrorism.
Join more than 17,000 others in a petition demanding action against the intrusive airport screening procedures implemented by Janet Napolitano and send a letter to Congress, President Obama and others telling them exactly what you think about the issue.
The issue has hit a flashpoint in the last few days as newly installed TSA procedures demand that airline passengers submit to a full-body scanning machine that generates an essentially nude image of the passenger for TSA workers to see, or a full-body pat-down that includes what critics have called "groping" of private parts of the body.
"These procedures are not effective at all with terrorists," Gabriel told WND in an interview today. "If a true terrorist wants to go blow up an airplane, these machines will not detect it."
She said like drug dealers already have proven, substances hidden inside body cavities or even embedded surgically remain undetected by any or all of the TSA's procedures.
"If al-Qaida is planning against the U.S. multiple attacks in a day, in multiple airplanes, it could duplicate 9/11," she told WND. "Al-Qaida is testing inserting breast implants, stuffing breast implants with explosives."
She said a woman then could go into an airplane restroom and use a syringe similar to those used by diabetic patients to trigger an explosion that would disintegrate a modern jet.
"This is what al-Qaida is resorting to, and they're exploring surgery for men," she warned. "They want to implant explosives inside the body.
"Terrorists are conditioned and trained to blow themselves up, to become suicide bombers," she said. "They are ready to die to go to heaven to meet Allah."
Replies to This Discussion
-
Permalink Reply by Clint Manuel on -
IN ADDITION, what about forced exposure to radiation from X-rays? How about the businessman who travels most of the year? What about small children through teenage years going through development?
And why should we be surprised by the outcry from Muslims and their propoganda mouthpiece - CAIR - on the 'religious offense' with their women? My problem with that is not that they have the nerve to complain or even that some lawmakers and politicians are considering it, but that there is actually a 'LEGISLATIVE COMPROMISE'! It's not about "if they search me, they have to search them too!". No! They will NOT search me or my children without cause! NO APPEASEMENT for PC whiners! It's just what Gabriel and MANY others with extensive knowlege of Islam KNOW! ISLAMIC TERRORISTS are...ISLAMIC!?!?! The little cinder-block room is waiting for ALL ISLAMIC-LOOKING persons! Profile the OBVIOUS SUSPECTS in this war of survival; don't put on some dog-and-pony show to APPEAR vigilant.
Thanks again, Tech Sarge!
-
Permalink Reply by American Man on -
What do you propose to do for our protection?
-
Permalink Reply by Uvin A. Clough JR., TSGT, USAF, RET. on
-
Check out My Post Sample E-mail to the House and Senate. This is the only Weapon we have other than Elections, this effective we enough Americans will Participate - not Just once, but Weekly to keep the pressure on -Yes there are elections but they are Too Little Too Late.
Take Care,
TSGT Clough
-
Permalink Reply by Pamela Silver on
-
EXACTLY! Being a former Flight Attendant with a major airline... I say: When they find a better way to 'check us out' great... but until then, I'm all for doing what they are presently doing AND MORE if need be. For those complaining... don't be so quick to condem the present actions for the sake of human lives! EVERYONE needs screening, even pilots. It's easy to get a uniform and ID... what's wrong with you people????? The country's security is pretty scarey these days with this administration (if you even want to call it an administration). Our guard is down completely as everyone is focusing on other issues of which I feel our security should be #1. What more of a better time than the present for the terrorists to do their thing??????????????????? Holiday season travel!
-
Permalink Reply by Uvin A. Clough JR., TSGT, USAF, RET. on
-
Thats all well and good and I suppose your willing for the same thing at entry points into each state? ? ? The acceptance of TheirLost Freedoms by the German People, like all of the Russian, Chines, Islamists, Peoples, ETC, Is not my cup of tea.
"They that can give up essential liberty to purchase a little temporary safety, deserve neither liberty nor safety." --Benjamin Franklin
-
-
Sorry but we disagree! I SAID: UNTIL THEY FIND SOMETHING BETTER... and by the way... 81% agree with me.
-
Permalink Reply by Uvin A. Clough JR., TSGT, USAF, RET. on
-
I don't know what stats your are quoting, but it would help a lot if you backed it up with the Source. From the uproar it is causing across the nations these seem doubtful.
-
Permalink Reply by Jim Robinson on -
TSA's new reactionary security measures ("enhanced" pat-downs and full body screens) will do nothing to prevent terrorists from using surgical implants or hiding explosives in their body cavities. What next? Body cavity searches? Anyone stupid enough to bend over for a TSA agent with a body cavity probe is just that - plain STUPID. But that's where we are headed if folks don't start using some common sense security procedures now.
Instead of using illegal, unconstitutional, and highly questionable REACTIVE security measures that just plain won't work (and clearly violate and invade our constitutional rights and freedoms), perhaps the TSA could learn a few PROACTIVE airport security measures from the hands down best airport security team in the world — the Israelis! Folks rarely ever have to pull off their shoes (much less submit to invasive security measures, unless absolutely needed in highly suspect cases).
The new invasive security procedures are being forced on the airlines by 0bama and the DHS. Has anyone considered that 0bama may be trying to force the airlines into bankruptcy so he can step in and save the day with more bail-outs to socialize yet another American industry? Big Government bureaucracy is the problem, folks, not the solution. Groping 3 year old girls and grandmothers in the so-called "war on terrorism" is just plain wrong no matter how you slice it and dice it. And please don't give me the liberal progressive script about how we must sacrifice some of our rights and freedoms to "protect" our greater freedoms. It is an oxymoron to suggest that we must give up our rights to protect them — you cannot protect that which you have given up. The job of Government is to protect and secure ALL of our rights and freedoms without sacrificing or bartering any of them to satisfy the capricious whims of Government.
And, by the way, considering all the fanfare and heated public reaction to TSA's new invasive security procedures, it is highly doubtful that 81% agree with you Pam (I am aware of no authoritative sources that can back up that spurious claim). But, even if true (which is highly doubtful), that would just mean that 81.5% of Americans are sheep that no longer care about their constitutional rights and freedoms and are willing to blindly jump off a cliff together — I am not one of them, I do care about my freedoms, and I will not blindly follow anyone that wants to trade our inalienable rights and freedoms for the ILLUSION of security.
Instead of giving in to fear and hysteria, we need to demand that our Government adopt common sense and proactive security measures that have worked so well for the Israelis (like profiling and non-invasive lobby screening by trained Israeli agents that have spent years, not days or weeks, "enhancing" their airport security measures). Common sense and proactive security measures - Yes! Questionable, unconstitutional, and reactive security measures - Hell no!
As Judge Andrew Napolitano said recently, "A nation of sheep begets a government of wolves." What can We the People do to stop this outrage by TSA and DHS? First, we can use some common sense and support Ron Paul's American Traveler's Dignity Act that was submitted this week to Congress. Florida Congressman John Mica (one of the co-creators of the TSA) has called on the airline industry to opt-out of TSA's new invasive security measures. The airline industry could also bring in Israeli trained agents and consultants to teach our folks how to do airport security right. I'm with Ron Paul, John Mica, and the Constitution on this one — no matter how many sheep, err Americans, want to sacrifice their freedoms in the pursuit of the illusion of security.
-
Permalink Reply by cesidio on -
Bravo. Someone once said that, " A government which promises security at the expense of freedom will provide neither."
-
Permalink Reply by Harold Dubbs on
-
Jim:
Thank you for your response . It is very true Illusion of safety is just what it is. Profiling will work.
-
Permalink Reply by cesidio on
-
Here's a couple of ideas:
1. Start profiling. Throw political correctness out the window and hold those who deserve the scrutiny under the scrutiny.
2. Put control of the screening process in the hands of the individual airlines and let paying customers decide for themselves what is acceptable by voting with their wallets.
There is no excuse--none what so ever--that can excuse the strip searching of 5 year old boys, the molestation of 3 year old girls and the groping of 70 year old nuns. True enough. we have to make a choice: fly or not fly. But we also have plenty of other choices: maybe come January we'll chose to write our congressmen to and tell them to cut all funding for the TSA , the underlying unions and the supporting bureaucracy.
This whole boondoggle to me seems like payback for the Nov. elections and cover for the Ahmed Ghailani farce.
-
Permalink Reply by American Man on
-
I agree!!
© 2013 Created by Earl B.
