TCUnation

social network for conservatives

Delaware Governor passes a law that arbitrarily violates Amend. I and XIV

Your Rights are at stake!!!

It is up to each voter to participate in preserving the rights of assembly, free speech and due process of the law.

Today Wolf von Baumgart, State Chairman, Independent Party of Delaware was on WGMD, discussing the ramifications that will take place unless everyone takes a stand to voice their opposition of the Recent change in the Election Laws in Delaware.

The next minor party in the sights of state law makers would be the Libertarian Party. And possibly the Independent Party as well.

It is up to you to decide whether your rights of assembly mean anything.. Just because this has impacted a minor party, Don't think for a minute this new law is not testing the water of the members of the Tea Party movement to see whether they will stand against this attack, thinking it is only a minority party.

Five minutes of your time is all it takes

You are asked to Call the Commissioner of Elections Office 302 739 4277

It is up to you to voice opposition to this law being implemented until after the General Election Nov 2, 2010.

Some of the federal rulings which are cited in the formal complaint to the Commissioner of Elections and Governors office, showing precedents implementing this new law during an election year is arbitrarily violating your Rights protected by the 1st and 14th Amendments include.

Bynum, 767 S.W.2d at 773.

United States v. Cardiff, 344 U.S. 174, 176 (1952)

Connally v. Gen. Constr. Co., 269 U.S. 385, 391 (1926).

Pursuant to Campbell v. Bennett, 212 F. Supp. 2d 1339, 1343 (M.D. Ala. 2002) (“[T]he due-process concept of fair notice . . . is central to the legitimacy of our legal system: ‘Elementary considerations of fairness dictate that individuals should have an opportunity to know what the law is and to conform their conduct accordingly; settled expectations should not be lightly disrupted.’” (quoting Landgraf v. USI Film Prods., 511 U.S. 244, 265 (1994))).

The Union as a Safeguard Against Domestic Faction and Insurrection
From the New York Packet. Friday, November 23, 1787. James Madison

T]he United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York (Gleeson, J.) granted plaintiffs a preliminary injunction. Green Party v. N.Y. State Bd. of Elections, 267 F. Supp. 2d 342 (E.D.N.Y. 2003)

Arizona Green Party v Bennett, injunction granted January 15, 2010

Fulani v Austin (Michigan in 1988), unreported

McCarthy v Austin (Michigan in 1988), unreported

Warren v Austin (Michigan in 1988), unreported

Holmes v Austin (Michigan in 1988), unreported

Nader 2000 Primary Committee v Hechler, 112 F Supp 2d 575 (West Virginia 2000)

Blomquist v Thomsen, 739 F 2d 525 (Wyoming 10th circuit 1984).

0 members like this