TCUnation
social network for conservatives
Bush-Bashers
So, I just left a comment on a friend's FB page. He said he was looking forward to making money todat, and I joked, that he meant make Obama, Pelosi and Reid some money. Another friend (who I am assuming is a lib) immediately commented that it is Bush's fault. So my question is, why is it that as soon as someone criticizes our "Annointed Leader", libs can not have a serious debate without bashing Bush? I know there are a lot of discussions on this, but I'd like to hear what The Wilkow Majority Fans think!
Replies to This Discussion
-
Permalink Reply by Nathan Lindberg on -
I don't think most libs have the ability to think rationally and responsibly about anything. My cousins are all haters, and leave nasty messages on my FB page all the time. Their arguements usually lack reason and logic.......Typical liberals......
-
-
Permalink Reply by David Rose on -
I'll tell you what was funny. After kicking this guys ass in a little debate, he stopped, and next thing I knew on my FB page, I was invited by him to a food fight. He couldn't win a heated debate, so he resorted to food throwing. THAT is a typical liberal! HA!
-
-
Permalink Reply by Logical on -
It's so true. Liberals are good at two things making excuses and making crummy movies. They have no well thought formulated opinions. When you oppose anythig Obama does all they can do is offer up excuses pertaining to what Bush did. They never support anything because that would mean that they would have to take a stand and defend it on things like principle. Instead they offer up name calling, Bush Bashing and rhetoric. Notice too that they always seem argue using sarcasm and as Wilkow says, snarky Liberal sarcasm is no match for ration thought.
Keep fighting David -
-
Permalink Reply by Kevin Sampson on -
It's quite simple....they have nothing else to argue. By keeping GW's name in the public mind then no one will pay attention to the complete disaster they are working on. Get this....a friend of mine works in the construction trade and he is part a union. He was told by his union leader that he (my friend) was a democrat because he believed in working hard to provide for his family (not to have gov't handouts), working to develop his own business and to pay only his fair share of taxes for the purposes they were intended and not for these massive bailouts. I gotta tell ya..either this union guy is not telling the truth or he has things mixed up?? I suppose we can blame Bush for at least one thing...we were all safer under his watch. Remember as Andrew Wilkow puts it...we are RIGHT they are wrong and that's the end of the story!!
-
© 2013 Created by Earl B.
