social network for conservatives
Tags:
Permalink Reply by BURL L. FAULK II on June 18, 2009 at 6:22pm
Permalink Reply by BURL L. FAULK II on June 19, 2009 at 4:19am i have been waiting for impeachment to come up. are our congress and senate under some kind of mind control? what the heck did we do? it needs to stop
Permalink Reply by Pat Croke on June 22, 2009 at 7:01am
Permalink Reply by Pat Croke on June 22, 2009 at 7:07am I am still amazed & ashamed that SO MANY Americans were stupid enough to vote for this lying, sneaky, good for nothing Muslim dirtbag.. He only " converted " to Christianity as a facade to get elected. He knew if he had not done the public " conversion " he would not have been elected... I am sick too of hearing he is our first Black President....... that is a crock, period! He is NOT the first PART Black president ( a mere 6.25% ) Read below....
Barack Hussein Obama - Arab-American, only 6.25% African
[Extracted from article on Arcade@home]
Barack Hussein Obama is not half black. If elected, he would be the first Arab-American President, not the first black President. Barack Hussein Obama is 50% Caucasian from his mother's side and 43.75% Arabic and 6.25% African Negro from his father's side. While Barack Hussein Obama's father was from Kenya, his father's family was mainly Arabs. Barack Hussein Obama's father was only 12.5% African Negro and 87.5% Arab (his father's birth certificate even states he's Arab, not African Negro).
What does this mean? Maybe nothing. But, why is Obama trying to hide this? Why does he try to hide is middle name? Why does he try to hide the religious Muslim school he attended as a child in Indonesia? Why doesn't he set the record straight that he wouldn't be the first black President? Why so many cover-ups and hiding of the truth?
Further, at only 6.25% African Negro, would he even be the first President who was part black? Not at all! Our 3rd President, Thomas Jefferson was our first part black President. And he's not alone, Andrew Jackson, Abraham Lincoln, Warren Harding and Calvin Coolidge were also part black.
President Andrew Jackson was the son of an Irish woman who married a black man. Andrew Jackson was such a high percentage black that his oldest brother was sold as a slave!
President Abraham Lincoln was the illegitimate son of an African man, he had very dark skin and coarse hair and his mother also allegedly came from an Ethiopian tribe. His heritage fueled so much controversy that Lincoln was nicknamed "Abraham Africanus the First" by his opponents.
President Warren Harding never even denied claims that he was black, because he had black ancestors between both sets of parents and he attended Iberia College, a school founded to educate fugitive slaves.
President Calvin Coolidge was proud of his heritage and claimed his mother was dark because of mixed Indian ancestry. Coolidge's mother's maiden name was "Moor" and in Europe the name "Moor" was given to all blacks just as "Negro" was used in America.
[Return to CFCIA Home Page]
Permalink Reply by BURL L. FAULK II on June 26, 2009 at 8:14am I think it is counterproductive to our cause to bring into question obama's ethnicity or religious background. America is founded on the principles of free practice of religion and multiculturalism, so obama's racial and religious backgrounds are irrelevant and make conservatives like myself look like bigots and a party of intolerance and ignorance. I have tried to rally my fellow conservatives away from a racial or religious focus towards one of policy and educated recognition of the faults of our current president. Nobody is going to impeach obama for being partially arab or black, nor will they even consider something so menial as his religious background, therefore it is better to try to recruit people to our cause based on policy rather than obama's heritage regardless of your stance on it. The idea here is to get people to not only listen to us but to acknowledge that we have a good point that should be carried through, not just some statistics on his ethnicity; such things are counterproductive and result in the liberals thinking that we are not addressing the real issues of policy, or they believe that we are just trying to catch obama in one of his many many slip ups. We should still catch him, but discretely.
I am loving the increase in patriotism and the move towards trying to protect America from obama, because that is what I believe she needs right now, protection. We are headed down a slippery slope towards socialism and the reforms that obama is proposing are so extreme that I doubt he will succeed in one field. Moreover, he claims to give a voice to everyone, yet my taxes have skyrocketed forcing my parents to consider selling the house I was born and raised in because the bills are too hard to pay, which has never been a problem. Obama needs to realize that what makes the economy work and the world go 'round are those that strive for success, instead of those who settle for poverty and mediocrity. Those who rise above and are strong are the sort that build America, not the lazy and stupid. That is not to say that they do not make up America, or are "un-American," but rather that the upperclass's taxes should not be raised merely because they have the money; such an idea cripples our most successful Americans and leads towards socialism: bringing down the wealthy, successful, and highest educated group to par with the poverty stricken, poorly educated sloth that is what composes most of the lower class. I am all for educating these people, but handing them my hard earned money that I worked hard in educational pursuit to be able to obtain seems just wacky to me. Our current economic situation needs to be handled with tact and class, not the unintelligent solution: "take money from those who have it and work hard for it and give it to those who are uneducated and have less." This has been called the "Robin Hood" approach and most liberals have laughed at this, saying that Robin Hood was well loved by the poor. This story is fantasy though, and Robin Hood does not eliminate poverty, hunger, or the problems with the fantastic economy, but rather increases the crime rate, condones robbery, and, in doing so, creates problems in his home country instead of trying to better it. Once again, though, Robin Hood is fantasy and should not be thought of as applicable to our situation, I am merely pointing out the idiocy of liberals who detract from our credibility by focusing on the non-issue, instead of the point that what obama does with his "Robin Hood" policy is just wrong. A move towards socialism, be it in the medical field or otherwise, is against everything inherent in what we call "The American Dream." I believe this "Dream" is what sustains us and makes us the greatest country in the world. If people's money can just be taken away and redistributed to those who don't earn as much, then what is there to strive for? What is the reason for working hard if your family's wealth is given to someone else? I am not an anti-humanitarian, nor do i believe that we shouldn't help the poor and unfortunate, but I do believe that it should be a choice instead of an imposition by the government. I believe that volunteering my time to better those less fortunate than I is a better way of aiding them than forced redistribution, which only breeds resentment. I should not resent these people, I should love them as my fellow Americans, but instead obama wishes to create a system in which those who are the most talented, successful, wealthy, and educated are pushed into a situation of mediocrity and are given no reason to strive for excellence, because it will merely be stripped from them.
FLY THE AMERICAN FLAG PROUD AND TRUE!
Permalink Reply by BURL L. FAULK II on June 26, 2009 at 8:46am You are a smart man I am ten I should know
BURL L. FAULK II said:I am still amazed & ashamed that SO MANY Americans were stupid enough to vote for this lying, sneaky, good for nothing Muslim dirtbag.. He only " converted " to Christianity as a facade to get elected. He knew if he had not done the public " conversion " he would not have been elected... I am sick too of hearing he is our first Black President....... that is a crock, period! He is NOT the first PART Black president ( a mere 6.25% ) Read below....
Barack Hussein Obama - Arab-American, only 6.25% African
[Extracted from article on Arcade@home]
Barack Hussein Obama is not half black. If elected, he would be the first Arab-American President, not the first black President. Barack Hussein Obama is 50% Caucasian from his mother's side and 43.75% Arabic and 6.25% African Negro from his father's side. While Barack Hussein Obama's father was from Kenya, his father's family was mainly Arabs. Barack Hussein Obama's father was only 12.5% African Negro and 87.5% Arab (his father's birth certificate even states he's Arab, not African Negro).
What does this mean? Maybe nothing. But, why is Obama trying to hide this? Why does he try to hide is middle name? Why does he try to hide the religious Muslim school he attended as a child in Indonesia? Why doesn't he set the record straight that he wouldn't be the first black President? Why so many cover-ups and hiding of the truth?
Further, at only 6.25% African Negro, would he even be the first President who was part black? Not at all! Our 3rd President, Thomas Jefferson was our first part black President. And he's not alone, Andrew Jackson, Abraham Lincoln, Warren Harding and Calvin Coolidge were also part black.
President Andrew Jackson was the son of an Irish woman who married a black man. Andrew Jackson was such a high percentage black that his oldest brother was sold as a slave!
President Abraham Lincoln was the illegitimate son of an African man, he had very dark skin and coarse hair and his mother also allegedly came from an Ethiopian tribe. His heritage fueled so much controversy that Lincoln was nicknamed "Abraham Africanus the First" by his opponents.
President Warren Harding never even denied claims that he was black, because he had black ancestors between both sets of parents and he attended Iberia College, a school founded to educate fugitive slaves.
President Calvin Coolidge was proud of his heritage and claimed his mother was dark because of mixed Indian ancestry. Coolidge's mother's maiden name was "Moor" and in Europe the name "Moor" was given to all blacks just as "Negro" was used in America.
[Return to CFCIA Home Page]
Permalink Reply by BURL L. FAULK II on June 26, 2009 at 8:55am Adam,
I was NOT truly focusing on his religious or ethnic background..... My full intention in my statement was SIMPLY that this man is a Liar, a Conniver, A Dodger & simply put he either lies directly or lies my omission. TO me that is very important for people to understand that he is now & apparently always has been a master of deceipt.
My belief & OBVIOUSLY many, many other TRUE Americans & other Nationalities as well believe that he is incapable of telling the truth, he is incapable of " Coming Clean " on ANY of his lies, deceptions, omissions etc.
We are dealing with someone whom I FEEL deep in my HEART has been STRATEGICALLY placed in the position that he is in for A REASON & that reason is multi-faceted & complex but, all at the same time it is SIMPLE as well by being DANGEROUS, SCARY & outright wrought with an EVIL INTENT... HE is merely a " Puppet " as one of our other posters on here so eloquently put it. He is merely a single piece of a much larger & ultimately destructive plan to do away with all that we Americans & other free nations have come to hold so dear....
He is in my opinion, A modern day Hitler.... to go along with that theory you must also look at the SOCIALISTIC way in which his mind works. Our nation was founded on the principles that GOD himself ordained in THE BEGINNING.
Now, we as a nation have allowed all of these special interest groups & loud-mouthed FEW to slowly & methodically tear this nation apart, rape us of our Constitutional rights etc. while we, the SILENT MAJORITY have just kicked back & said to ourselves time and again that " Oh, that will never get by Congress " or, " No way will America allow that to happen "... But, that is ALL THAT WE HAVE DONE.... Sat back & watched it happen, one thing at a time until it has become a massive & alarming problem with so much momentum that it may be too late to stop it.
Then, people have the Audacity to wonder why we are where we are as a nation.....
AGAIN, it has NOTHING to do with his Race.... I could care less if he were green or blue, my major problem with this
" Ego-Man " is that he is going to destroy this Country IF we let him.... And from what I can see, WE are again sitting back & letting him do just that.
My previous post was simply to show people that he will lie about ANYTHING as long as it promotes & advances HIS EVIL AGENDA...
B. Faulk II
Adam Rogoff said:I think it is counterproductive to our cause to bring into question obama's ethnicity or religious background. America is founded on the principles of free practice of religion and multiculturalism, so obama's racial and religious backgrounds are irrelevant and make conservatives like myself look like bigots and a party of intolerance and ignorance. I have tried to rally my fellow conservatives away from a racial or religious focus towards one of policy and educated recognition of the faults of our current president. Nobody is going to impeach obama for being partially arab or black, nor will they even consider something so menial as his religious background, therefore it is better to try to recruit people to our cause based on policy rather than obama's heritage regardless of your stance on it. The idea here is to get people to not only listen to us but to acknowledge that we have a good point that should be carried through, not just some statistics on his ethnicity; such things are counterproductive and result in the liberals thinking that we are not addressing the real issues of policy, or they believe that we are just trying to catch obama in one of his many many slip ups. We should still catch him, but discretely.
I am loving the increase in patriotism and the move towards trying to protect America from obama, because that is what I believe she needs right now, protection. We are headed down a slippery slope towards socialism and the reforms that obama is proposing are so extreme that I doubt he will succeed in one field. Moreover, he claims to give a voice to everyone, yet my taxes have skyrocketed forcing my parents to consider selling the house I was born and raised in because the bills are too hard to pay, which has never been a problem. Obama needs to realize that what makes the economy work and the world go 'round are those that strive for success, instead of those who settle for poverty and mediocrity. Those who rise above and are strong are the sort that build America, not the lazy and stupid. That is not to say that they do not make up America, or are "un-American," but rather that the upperclass's taxes should not be raised merely because they have the money; such an idea cripples our most successful Americans and leads towards socialism: bringing down the wealthy, successful, and highest educated group to par with the poverty stricken, poorly educated sloth that is what composes most of the lower class. I am all for educating these people, but handing them my hard earned money that I worked hard in educational pursuit to be able to obtain seems just wacky to me. Our current economic situation needs to be handled with tact and class, not the unintelligent solution: "take money from those who have it and work hard for it and give it to those who are uneducated and have less." This has been called the "Robin Hood" approach and most liberals have laughed at this, saying that Robin Hood was well loved by the poor. This story is fantasy though, and Robin Hood does not eliminate poverty, hunger, or the problems with the fantastic economy, but rather increases the crime rate, condones robbery, and, in doing so, creates problems in his home country instead of trying to better it. Once again, though, Robin Hood is fantasy and should not be thought of as applicable to our situation, I am merely pointing out the idiocy of liberals who detract from our credibility by focusing on the non-issue, instead of the point that what obama does with his "Robin Hood" policy is just wrong. A move towards socialism, be it in the medical field or otherwise, is against everything inherent in what we call "The American Dream." I believe this "Dream" is what sustains us and makes us the greatest country in the world. If people's money can just be taken away and redistributed to those who don't earn as much, then what is there to strive for? What is the reason for working hard if your family's wealth is given to someone else? I am not an anti-humanitarian, nor do i believe that we shouldn't help the poor and unfortunate, but I do believe that it should be a choice instead of an imposition by the government. I believe that volunteering my time to better those less fortunate than I is a better way of aiding them than forced redistribution, which only breeds resentment. I should not resent these people, I should love them as my fellow Americans, but instead obama wishes to create a system in which those who are the most talented, successful, wealthy, and educated are pushed into a situation of mediocrity and are given no reason to strive for excellence, because it will merely be stripped from them.
FLY THE AMERICAN FLAG PROUD AND TRUE!
© 2013 Created by Earl B.