Global Warming Heretics

Information

Global Warming Heretics

tcuiss For all who do not worship at the alter of global warming. We believe in caring for our environment, but not at the expense of private property rights, human rights, or our economy. Share ideas on how we can combat destructive legislation.

Website: http://www.tcunation.com/group/globalwarmingheretics
Members: 96
Latest Activity: Mar 22, 2012


31,000 Scientists signed this petition stating that CO2 is not causing global warming or hurting our environment.

They actually say that the increases in CO2 are helping the environment by stimulating plant growth!

The Petition Project

31,072 American scientists have signed this petition,
including 9,021 with PhDs



Discussion Forum

Comment Wall

Comment

You need to be a member of Global Warming Heretics to add comments!

Comment by Kathryn McEwen on October 28, 2010 at 2:19am
Comment by Kathryn McEwen on October 26, 2010 at 1:41am
Lindsey Williams: Deathbed Globalist "Spills Gut" On Plan to Destroy America - Alex Jones TV 1 thru 6 - YouRTubeNews (If unable to access the following are the YouTube links.)

Part 1 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mhIXEvhbcl8
Part 2 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9p04QFOKSaI
Part 3 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TOnJiABdQn8
Part 4 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=h8to7IZy5_4
Part 5 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Dle5R91iPOg
Part 6 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z1YV27vyIeM
Comment by Kathryn McEwen on October 13, 2010 at 4:11pm
Comment by Kathryn McEwen on October 1, 2010 at 1:52am
GLOBAL GOVERNANCE INFO/SITES/DOCS

The National Intelligence Council's site announcement is here -
http://www.dni.gov/press_releases/20100920_release.pdf

That links to this page -
http://www.dni.gov/nic/NIC_home.html

and the document is here -
http://www.foia.cia.gov/2025/2025_Global_Governance.pdf
Comment by Kathryn McEwen on September 22, 2010 at 1:57am
HTTP://townhall,com/columnist/PaulDressen/2010/09/21/unsustainable_cow_manure
Paul Driessen
Unsustainable Cow Manure
Seek a sustainable future! Wind, solar and biofuels will ensure an eco-friendly, climate-protecting, planet-saving, sustainable inheritance for our children. Or so we are told by activists and politicians intent on enacting new renewable energy standards, mandates and subsidies during a lame duck session.
It may be useful to address some basic issues, before going further down the road to Renewable Utopia.

First, when exactly is something not sustainable? When known deposits (proven reserves) may be depleted in ten years? 50? 100? What if looming depletion results from government policies that forbid access to lands that might contain new deposits - as with US onshore and offshore prospects for oil, gas, coal, uranium, rare earth minerals and other vital resources?

Rising prices and improved discovery and extraction technologies and techniques typically expand energy and mineral reserves - postponing depletion by years or decades, as in the case of oil and natural gas. But legislation, regulation, taxation and litigation prevent these processes from working properly, hasten depletion, and make "sustainability" an even more politicized, manipulated and meaningless concept.

Second, should the quest for mandated "sustainable" technologies be based on real, immediate threats - or will imaginary or exaggerated crises suffice? Dangerous manmade global cooling morphed into dangerous manmade global warming, then into "global climate disruption" - driven by computer models and disaster scenarios, doctored temperature data, manipulated peer reviews, and bogus claims about melting glaciers and rising sea levels. Shouldn't policies that replace reliable, affordable energy with expensive, intermittent, land-intensive, subsidized sources be based on real science?

Third, shouldn't inconvenient sustainability issues be resolved before we proceed any further, by applying the same guidelines to renewable energy as courts, regulators and eco-activists apply to fossil fuels?

Most oil, gas, coal and uranium operations impact limited acreage for limited times - and affected areas must be restored to natural conditions when production ends. Effects on air and water quality, habitats and protected species are addressed through regulations, lease restrictions and fines. The operations generate vast amounts of affordable, reliable energy from relatively small tracts of land, and substantial revenues.
Comment by Kathryn McEwen on August 12, 2010 at 2:51am
Comment by Kathryn McEwen on August 3, 2010 at 2:50am
1) Could this be about the "Rewilding America" program only in disguise? Remember the Harry Reid "Omnibus Land Bill" from last year? I will bet it was the down payment on this plan!

http://www.freedomadvocates.org/



2) I will be a monkey's uncle if either of these links is not either L.O.S.T. and/or Cap & Trade in disguise or both (a "twofer" - two for the price of one!). Remember this administration likes to change names and wording in the hopes WTP will be too stupid to figure it out.

http://www.whitehouse.gov/administration/eop/oceans

OR

http://www.infowars.com/national-ocean-council/
Comment by Kathryn McEwen on July 22, 2010 at 1:24am
PELOSI USES HOUSE OBSERVERS TO BEAT ANTI-MORATORIUM ACT

http://www.westernjournalism.com/damn-your-constitution-pelosi-ille...
Comment by Kathryn McEwen on March 24, 2010 at 2:07am
Agenda 21 - the New world Order calls for the US to give up sovereignty to the UN

http://www.un.org/esa/dsd/agenda21/res_agenda21_00.shtml
--------

Nancy Pelosi and agenda 21 it is here

http://www.middletownca.com/FREEDOM21-PELOSI-NANCY.htm
--------

WILDLANDS PROJECT/PELOSI
http://www.freedomadvocates.org/articles/illegitimate_government/pe...
Comment by Kathryn McEwen on February 24, 2010 at 12:59am
A good article on the cost of the climate "global warming" fraud from climatedepot.com 2/21/10:

Quoting one small paragraph. To read at length: http://factsnotfantasy.blogspot.com/2010/02/multi-billion-dollar-gl...

"According to a recently released study by the National Association of Utility Regulatory Commissioners, the U.S. gross domestic product would lose $2.36 trillion and American consumers will pay an additional $2.35 trillion for energy if the oil and gas on federal lands remain off-limits through 2030. This constitutes a form of energy and economic suicide!"
 

Members (95)

 
 
 

 

Badge

Loading…

© 2013   Created by Earl B.

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service