I say NO to the Fairness Doctrine

Information

I say NO to the Fairness Doctrine

The Democrats seek to use the Fairness Doctrine to silence talk radio dominated by conservative talk. tcuissue

Members: 120
Latest Activity: Sep 19, 2010

I say No to the Fairness Doctrine

Help people understand the Fairness Doctrine.

Invite your facebook friends to join our group on facebook:
I say No to Fairness Doctrine on facebook

Discussion Forum

Progressively Stealing Our Free-Thinking

Started by Lisa Richards. Last reply by Laura Eide Mar 8, 2010. 1 Reply

I RECIEVED THIS FROM A FRIEND IN AUSTRALIA. READ CAREFULLY.

Started by Prof. F. V. Pennese. Last reply by Laura Eide Jan 21, 2010. 1 Reply

Comment Wall

Comment

You need to be a member of I say NO to the Fairness Doctrine to add comments!

Comment by Kathryn McEwen on March 20, 2010 at 2:15am
Subject: Government using Microsoft to SPY on YOU (CHECK THE LINKS ASAP)"

Well...we were told about ....here's the video about it...download while you can...

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nPoQ14scoAc&feature=email

Take a look at this! Before I add lots of links I would like to thank YouTube and
RTAmerica.
Cryptome is where I found the information linking Joseph
Stack to September 11th 2001. PLEASE PLEASE see my video here-
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=z9sdYhAuG2g
All I want is the truth in my
lifetime, Joseph Stack has ties with the destruction of 9/11. His
website
is archived on Cryptome and his phone number registers to the
Texas
Governors Mansion. Does anyone think that is weird?

You want the
truth?

Joe Stack Web Site-
http://cryptome.org/0001/embeddedart.htm
PayPal Spying Guide-
http://cryptome.org/isp-spy/paypal-spy.zip
MySpace Spying Guide-
http://cryptome.org/isp-spy/myspace-spy.pdf
Microbiologist Meryl Nass on FBI
Anthrax
SNAFU-
http://cryptome.org/0001/meryl-nass.htm
Obama's Afpak
Military
Dead-
http://cryptome.org/info/afpak-dead/afpak-dead.htm
Microsoft
Global Criminal Spy Guide-
http://cryptome.org//isp-spy/micro... more
Comment by Kathryn McEwen on January 5, 2010 at 10:45am
LINK TO FILE COMMENTS TO FCC AGAINST INTERNET POWER GRAB:

http://americansforprosperity.org/internet-comment

A couple of months ago I told you about the FCC's regulatory power grab, boosted by the radical left, to gain control of the Internet and potentially our whole communications system. With Glenn Beck's help, we exposed the White House Czar charged with technology policy, Susan Crawford, and she was forced to resign. Unfortunately, the left's effort to take over the Internet continues. The Federal Communications Commission is moving ahead with proposed "Open Internet" rules, which would give federal regulators vast new powers, and ultimately lead to government control of the Internet.

The stakes are huge, and will help determine outcomes on all the other issues we care about. That's because as long as the Internet is free, we can use it to communicate, educate, and organize. This is what's at stake as the FCC moves forward with its ridiculously misnamed "Open Internet" rulemaking.

Please click here to file official FCC comments opposing a Washington takeover of the Internet. Take action today - the deadline is fast approaching.

"Open Internet" is the left's latest marketing language for what they used to call "net neutrality." It is an outgrowth of the larger so-called media reform project of radical left-wing activists like Robert McChesney, the Free Press founder who explained his goal to SocialistProject.ca: "What we want to have in the U.S. and in every society is an Internet that is not private property, but a public utility."

"Open Internet" or "net neutrality" sounds simple - force phone and cable companies to treat every bit of information the same way - until you realize that modern networks are incredibly complex, with millions of lines of code in every router. Making sure services like VoIP, video conferencing, and telemedicine (not to mention the next great thing that hasn't been invented yet) get priority may be necessary to make the Internet work, but the government is considering regulations that will make it illegal to prioritize traffic.

These networks cost billions of dollars to build and maintain, and if there is uncertainty about getting a good return on that investment, private investment will dry up. And then government will step in, spending billions of our tax dollars on a government-owned and controlled Internet.

Although Susan Crawford is gone, the White House Internet power grab goes much higher, to President Obama himself. He said on the campaign trail: "I will take a backseat to no one in my commitment to Net Neutrality."

Please click here to file official FCC comments opposing a Washington takeover of the Internet.

LINK TO FILE COMMENTS TO FCC AGAINST INTERNET POWER GRAB:

http://americansforprosperity.org/internet-comment


Thanks for all you do.

Phil Kerpen
Vice President and Director of Policy, Americans for Prosperity
Chairman, Internet Freedom Coalition

P.S. After you click here to file comments with the FCC against its proposed "Open Internet" rule and in support of a truly open, competitive, privately owned and controlled network, please forward this message to anyone you know who can help us fight for real Internet freedom. And please follow me on Twitter (http://twitter.com/kerpen) and Facebook (http://facebook.com/PhilKerpen) for the latest news. Thanks!
Like what Americans for Prosperity is doing? Invest in our work by clicking here. We're supported by our more than 800,000 citizen-activists nationwide. Your contribution in any amount will go a long way in promoting free-market policies at all levels of government - local, state and federal. Thanks!


For more information, visit www.americansforprosperity.org
Comment by Hardcore Conservative on December 20, 2009 at 6:58pm
Kathryn it's too late Nelson has already been bought off
Comment by Kathryn McEwen on December 20, 2009 at 6:42pm
I just signed Mike Huckabee's Emergency Petition to Senator Ben Nelson. I urge you to do the same.

Please use this link:

http://tr.im/I7lS

Our goal is to collect 100,000 signatures by the final Senate vote.
Comment by Kathryn McEwen on December 20, 2009 at 1:33am
NET NEUTRALITY THREATENS FREEDOM OF SPEECH

Excellent explanation by Tim Carter of how "Net Neutrality" threatens free speech and our general access to information in the United States:

http://www.timcartersfirepit.com/net-neutrality-explained-in-simple...
Comment by Kathryn McEwen on December 18, 2009 at 4:45am
OBAMA'S FAIRNESS DOCTRINE?

H.R. 1147: Local Community Radio Act of 2009
passed in the House Dec 17, 2009

http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd?bill=h111-1147
Comment by Julie Tenpenny on November 26, 2009 at 7:32pm
If the Libs want their say, why don't they jolly well succeed at it the good old fashioned competitive way? No, their answer is always socialistic, because they need to level the playing field to make up for their ineptness. Free market is like a four letter word to them. The pack of babies!
Comment by Stacy Williams on October 23, 2009 at 7:02pm
JOIN THE 9.12 REVOLUTION!

Order your Official Glenn Beck 9.12 Revolution and "Going Rogue" Sarah Palin for President 2012 t-shirts to wear to the next Town Hall meetings and March on Washington, D.C.!

Be the center of attention wherever you go!

On Sale now with FREE shipping at http://www.wallstreetmarketnews.com/tshirts.html



We ordered 28 t-shirts which helped us recruit 12 new Tea Party Members this week!

Stacy
Comment by Eliozabeth Hasselbeck on October 19, 2009 at 10:08pm
JOIN THE 9.12 REVOLUTION!

Order your Official "Glenn Beck 9.12 Project" T-Shirt!

It is on Sale right now with FREE Shipping at http://www.wallstreetmarketnews.com/tshirts.html

I also ordered their "Going Rogue Sarah Palin for President 2012"!

I'm going to wear it to the next Tea Party and the next March on Washington, D.C.!

Pass this link on to let your friends know!
Comment by Paddy O'Brian on October 6, 2009 at 4:24pm
The fairness doctrine has no fairness as far as i am concerned. The main purpose of this is to silence our free speech namely the conservative side's speech. What willl we have then a tyranny or course because it sure as **** will not be a democracy.

I will be D**ned if i allow them to seal my lips and prohibit me as a conservative from speaking my mind!!
 

Members (116)

 
 
 

 

Badge

Loading…

© 2013   Created by Earl B.

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service