Mark Levin
Information
Radio Talk Show, Best Selling Author
6-9pm EST ABC Radio Networks and XM America Right
tcufan
Website: http://www.marklevinshow.com
Members: 316
Latest Activity: Mar 12
Mark Levin
Mark Levin - "The Great One" Mark Levin has become one of the hottest properties in Talk radio, his top-rated show on WABC New York is now syndicated nationally by ABC Radio Networks. He is also one of the top new authors in the conservative political arena. Mark’s radio show on WABC in New York City skyrocketed to Number 1 on the AM dial in his first 18 months on the air in the competitive 6:00 PM - 8:00 PM time slot. Mark’s book Men in Black was released February 7, 2005 and quickly climbed to Number 3 in the nation on the New York Times Best-Seller list. When your book is endorsed by Rush Limbaugh and Sean Hannity, you know you have a winner on your hands. In a short period of time, Mark has become one of the most listened to local radio Talk show hosts in the nation.
Mark Levin took over the WABC 6:00 PM slot on September 2, 2003. Before that, he hosted a popular Sunday afternoon program. “He’s smart, witty, and fast on the draw,” according to WABC Program Director Phil Boyce. “He has this sharp sarcastic wit that can easily stun his opponents. I know I would not want to debate him.” Mark’s show follows the ever popular Rush Limbaugh and Sean Hannity on WABC, but everyday he manages to come up with a new twist on the day’s top news events, as well as his own unique information. His passion and intellect have made him a favorite of tens of thousands of radio listeners in the New York City area.
Mark has been a frequent guest and substitute host on The Sean Hannity Show, and has also been an advisor to Limbaugh, who frequently refers to him on the air with the nickname “F. Lee Levin.” He is perhaps more well-known for his nickname, “The Great One,” coined by his friend Hannity.
Mark Levin is one of America’s preeminent conservative commentators and constitutional lawyers. He’s in great demand as a political and legal commentator, and has appeared on hundreds of television and radio programs. Levin is also a contributing editor for National Review Online, and writes frequently for other publications. Levin has served as a top advisor to several members of President Ronald Reagan’s Cabinet - including as Chief of Staff to the Attorney General of the United States. In 2001, the American Conservative Union named Levin the recipient of the prestigious Ronald Reagan Award. He currently practices law in the private sector, heading up the prestigious Landmark Legal Foundation in Washington DC.
Fan website - marklevinfan.com
Mark on Twitter - @marklevinshow
Mark Levin took over the WABC 6:00 PM slot on September 2, 2003. Before that, he hosted a popular Sunday afternoon program. “He’s smart, witty, and fast on the draw,” according to WABC Program Director Phil Boyce. “He has this sharp sarcastic wit that can easily stun his opponents. I know I would not want to debate him.” Mark’s show follows the ever popular Rush Limbaugh and Sean Hannity on WABC, but everyday he manages to come up with a new twist on the day’s top news events, as well as his own unique information. His passion and intellect have made him a favorite of tens of thousands of radio listeners in the New York City area.
Mark has been a frequent guest and substitute host on The Sean Hannity Show, and has also been an advisor to Limbaugh, who frequently refers to him on the air with the nickname “F. Lee Levin.” He is perhaps more well-known for his nickname, “The Great One,” coined by his friend Hannity.
Mark Levin is one of America’s preeminent conservative commentators and constitutional lawyers. He’s in great demand as a political and legal commentator, and has appeared on hundreds of television and radio programs. Levin is also a contributing editor for National Review Online, and writes frequently for other publications. Levin has served as a top advisor to several members of President Ronald Reagan’s Cabinet - including as Chief of Staff to the Attorney General of the United States. In 2001, the American Conservative Union named Levin the recipient of the prestigious Ronald Reagan Award. He currently practices law in the private sector, heading up the prestigious Landmark Legal Foundation in Washington DC.
Fan website - marklevinfan.com
Mark on Twitter - @marklevinshow
Discussion Forum
Levin's speech at the Reagan Library
Started by cesidio Mar 9.
Progressively Stealing Our Free-Thinking
Started by Lisa Richards Mar 8.
Are We There Yet?
Started by Lisa Richards Jan 29.
RSS
Loading feed
Comment Wall
Comment
-
Comment by Walter Edwards on January 22, 2010 at 6:36pm - A man who tells it like it is, staight to the point, no holds bar.
-
Comment by TheEarthisNotFlat on January 20, 2010 at 2:46pm
-
New podcast is live and new one’s every week
Follow me on Twitter @UnitedWeRemain
-
Comment by Nuray Gercek on December 28, 2009 at 12:33am -
Terrorists are atacking our country
Obama is playing Tiger Wood in Hawaii
Where is Hillary?
Has she answered this 3 AM call already?
www.rushforpresident.com
-
Comment by Charles L. Buttrum on December 24, 2009 at 7:40pm - Merry Christmas to all and to all a good night, for day after tomorrow we have our work cut out for us, Get Our Country Back and Kick out the Bums that call them selves OUR Representatives. I understand that by the end of January THEY are coming after us to get our firearms by force with foreign troops?
-
Comment by PAUL REVERE on December 22, 2009 at 6:29am
-
19 December 2009
Supremes : 'Suspected Enemy Combatant' no Longer a 'Person'
Portrait of a non-person. Image from girloftomorrow.
Dred Scott redux:
Enemy combatants denied legal standing
...once again, 144 years after the Civil War, we have established as the law of the land and the policy of the United States government that whole classes of people can be declared 'non-persons' and have their liberty stripped away...
By Chris Floyd / December 19, 2009
While we were all out doing our Christmas shopping, the highest court in the land quietly put the kibosh on a few more of the remaining shards of human liberty.
It happened earlier this week, in a discreet ruling that attracted almost no notice and took little time. In fact, our most august defenders of the Constitution did not have to exert themselves in the slightest to eviscerate not merely 220 years of Constitutional jurisprudence but also centuries of agonizing effort to lift civilization a few inches out of the blood-soaked mire that is our common human legacy. They just had to write a single sentence.
Here's how the bad deal went down. After hearing passionate arguments from the Obama Administration, the Supreme Court acquiesced to the president's fervent request and, in a one-line ruling, let stand a lower court decision that declared torture an ordinary, expected consequence of military detention, while introducing a shocking new precedent for all future courts to follow: anyone who is arbitrarily declared a "suspected enemy combatant" by the president or his designated minions is no longer a "person."
They will simply cease to exist as a legal entity. They will have no inherent rights, no human rights, no legal standing whatsoever -- save whatever modicum of process the government arbitrarily deigns to grant them from time to time, with its ever-shifting tribunals and show trials.
This extraordinary ruling occasioned none of those deep-delving "process stories" that glut the pages of the New York Times, where the minutiae of policy-making or political gaming is examined in highly-spun, microscopic detail doled out by self-interested insiders. Obviously, giving government the power to render whole classes of people "unpersons" was not an interesting subject for our media arbiters. It was news that wasn't fit to print. Likewise, the ruling provoked no thundering editorials in the Washington Post, no savvy analysis from the high commentariat -- and needless to say, no outrage whatsoever from all our fierce defenders of individual liberty on the Right.
But William Fisher noticed, and gave this report at Antiwar.com:
In the wake of the U.S. Supreme Court’s refusal Monday to review a lower court’s dismissal of a case brought by four British former Guantanamo prisoners against former defense secretary Donald Rumsfeld, the detainees’ lawyers charged Tuesday that the country’s highest court evidently believes that "torture and religious humiliation are permissible tools for a government to use."
[....]
Channeling their predecessors in the George W. Bush administration, Obama Justice Department lawyers argued in this case that there is no constitutional right not to be tortured or otherwise abused in a U.S. prison abroad.
The Obama administration had asked the court not to hear the case. By agreeing, the court let stand an earlier opinion by the D.C. Circuit Court, which found that the Religious Freedom Restoration Act -- a statute that applies by its terms to all "persons" -- did not apply to detainees at Guantanamo, effectively ruling that the detainees are not persons at all for purposes of U.S. law.
The lower court also dismissed the detainees’ claims under the Alien Tort Statute and the Geneva Conventions, finding defendants immune on the basis that "torture is a foreseeable consequence of the military’s detention of suspected enemy combatants."
The Constitution is clear: no person can be held without due process; no person can be subjected to cruel and unusual punishment. And the U.S. law on torture of any kind is crystal clear: it is forbidden, categorically, even in time of "national emergency." And the instigation of torture is, under U.S. law, a capital crime. No person can be tortured, at any time, for any reason, and there are no immunities whatsoever for torture offered anywhere in the law.
And yet this is what Barack Obama -- who, we are told incessantly, is a super-brilliant Constitutional lawyer -- has been arguing in case after case since becoming president: Torturers are immune from prosecution; those who ordered torture are immune from prosecution. They can't even be sued for, in the specific case under review, subjecting uncharged, indefinitely detained captives to "beatings, sleep deprivation, forced nakedness, extreme hot and cold temperatures, death threats, interrogations at gunpoint, and threatened with unmuzzled dogs."
Again, let's be absolutely clear: Barack Obama has taken the freely chosen, public, formal stand -- in court -- that there is nothing wrong with any of these activities. Nothing to answer for, nothing meriting punishment or even civil penalties. What's more, in championing the lower court ruling, Barack Obama is now on record as believing -- insisting -- that torture is an ordinary, "foreseeable consequence" of military detention of all those who are arbitrarily declared "suspected enemy combatants."
And still further: Barack Obama has now declared, openly, of his own free will, that he does not consider these captives to be "persons." They are, literally, sub-humans. And what makes them sub-humans? The fact that someone in the U.S. government has declared them to be "suspected enemy combatants." (And note: even the mere suspicion of being an "enemy combatant" can strip you of your personhood.)
This is what President Barack Obama believes -- believes so strongly that he has put the full weight of the government behind a relentless series of court actions to preserve, protect and defend these arbitrary powers. (For a glimpse at just a sliver of such cases, go here.)
One co-counsel on the case, Shayana Kadidal of the Center for Constitutional Rights, zeroed in on the noxious quintessence of the position taken by the Court, and by our first African-American president: its chilling resemblance to the notorious Dred Scott ruling of 1857, which upheld the principle of slavery. As Fisher notes:
"Another set of claims are dismissed because Guantanamo detainees are not ‘persons’ within the scope of the Religious Freedom Restoration Act -- an argument that was too close to Dred Scott v. Sanford for one of the judges on the court of appeals to swallow," he added.
The Dred Scott case was a decision by the United States Supreme Court in 1857. It ruled that people of African descent imported into the United States and held as slaves, or their descendants — whether or not they were slaves — were not protected by the Constitution and could never be citizens of the United States.
And now, once again, 144 years after the Civil War, we have established as the law of the land and the policy of the United States government that whole classes of people can be declared "non-persons" and have their liberty stripped away -- and their torturers and tormentors protected and coddled by authority -- at a moment's notice, with no charges, no defense, no redress, on nothing more than the suspicion that they might be an "enemy combatant," according to the arbitrary definition of the state.
Barack Obama has had the audacity to declare himself the heir and embodiment of the lifework of Martin Luther King. Can this declaration of a whole new principle of universal slavery really be what King was dreaming of? Is this the vision he saw on the other side of the mountain? Or is not the nightmarish inversion of the ideal of a better, more just, more humane world that so many have died for, in so many places, down through the centuries
-
Comment by Charles L. Buttrum on December 16, 2009 at 1:52pm
- IF YOU ARE obama AND CO-HEARTS AND YOU THINK AND ACT LIKE YOUR ABOVE THE LAW OF THE LAND AND ARE COMMITTING TREASON AMOUNG OTHER CRIMES, WHO IS IT THAT ARREST AND INCARCERATS YOU?? WOULD SOMEONE PLEASE STEP UP TO THE TABLE, MAYBE SHERIFF JOE ARPIO IN ARIZONA CAN DO THE JOB FOR US.?
-
Comment by Nuray Gercek on November 20, 2009 at 10:38pm
-
SANTA RUSH
Oh, jingle bells jingle bells
Jingle all the time
Santa Rush will give us our Freedom
We behaved very well all this year
We don't deserve a Christmas fear
Santa please let us see and hear
That you would fight Obamacare
Oh, jingle bells jingle bells
Jingle all the time
Santa Rush will give us our Freedom
Santa Rush is now needed
By the children, sick and elderly
And by women waiting to be tested
For breast cancer until they're fifty
Oh, jingle bells jingle bells
Jingle all the time
Santa Rush will save us from Obama doom
Santa bring us Freemarket Care
Accessible to everyone everywhere
Travel and change of place I dare
Please rescue us from prisonal care.
www.rushforpresident.com
-
Comment by Charles L. Buttrum on November 7, 2009 at 1:03pm
- WE MUST BE FAXING OUR REPRASENATIVES NOW BEFORE THE VOTE IS TAKEN ON HEALTHCARE TODAY!!!!!!! SATURDAY 07, 2009
-
Comment by Charles L. Buttrum on November 5, 2009 at 10:48pm
-
The $1.2 Trillion dollar Healthcare Bill is expected to be pushed to a vote on November 7, 2009.
The U.S. House of Representatives is pushing
forward with a healthcare bill that will take
control of your healthcare future. They will
fine, penalize and possibly jail you for not participating. It will also take control of 1/6 of the entire U.S. Economy at a cost of $1.2+ Trillion Dollars.
We need your support in defeating this bill as the House is expected to vote on this bill on Saturday 11/7/2009.
In a protest today, Michelle Bachmann calls Saturday's vote the "Super Bowl of Freedom"
THE TIME IS NOW TO STAND UP. WE MUST CALL, FAX, AND EMAIL WASHINGTON TO LET THEM KNOW WE WILL NOT STAND FOR SOCIALIZED MEDICINE.
Click Here to download a summary of the 1,990 page bill.
Call your local representative and ALL THE BLUE DOG DEMOCRATS in a non-stop barrage. Let them know the American public says NO to healthcare reform. Ask them if they saw the election on Tuesday. Let them know a vote for healthcare will get them booted next November.
The Blue Dog Democrat Phone Numbers are listed below.
Rep. Stephanie Herseth Sandlin (SD), Blue Dog Co-Chair for Administration, Telephone: 202.225.2801 , Fax: 202.225.5823
Rep. Baron Hill (IN-09), Blue Dog Co-Chair for Policy,Telephone: 202-225-4031, Fax: (202) 226-6866
Rep. Charlie Melancon (LA-03), Blue Dog Co-Chair for Communications, Telephone: 202-225-4031, Fax: (202) 226-3944
Rep. Heath Shuler (NC-11), Blue Dog Whip, Telephone: 202-225-6401, Fax: (202) 226-6422
The Blue Dog Members and their telephone numbers are :
Altmire, Jason (PA-04),(202)225-2565
Arcuri, Mike (NY-24), (202)225-3665
Baca, Joe (CA-43),(202)225-6161
Barrow, John (GA-12), (202) 225-2823
Berry, Marion (AR-01), (202) 225-4076
Bishop, Sanford (GA-02), (202) 225-3631
Boren, Dan (OK-02), (202) 225-2701
Boswell, Leonard (IA-03), (202) 225-3806
Boyd, Allen (FL-02), (202) 225-5235
Bright, Bobby (AL-02), (202) 225-2901
Cardoza, Dennis (CA-18), (202) 225-6131
Carney, Christopher (PA-10), (202) 225-3731
Chandler, Ben (KY-06), (202) 225-4706
Childers, Travis (MS-01), (202) 225-4306
Cooper, Jim (TN 5th), (202) 225-4311
Costa, Jim (CA 20th), (202) 225-3341
Cuellar, Henry (TX 28th), (202) 225-1640
Dahlkemper, Kathleen A. (PA 3rd), (202) 225-5406
Davis, Lincoln (TN 4th),(202) 225-6831
Donnelly, Joe (IN 2nd), (202) 225-3915
Ellsworth, Brad (IN 8th), (202) 225-4636
Giffords, Gabrielle (AZ 8th), (202) 225-2542
Gordon, Bart (TN 6th), (202) 225-4231
Griffith, Parker (AL 5th), (202) 225-4801
Harman, Jane (CA 36th), (202) 225-8220
Herseth Sandlin, Stephanie (SD At Large), (202) 225-2801
Hill, Baron P. (IN 9th), (202) 225-5315
Holden, Tim (PA 17th), (202) 225-5546
Kratovil, Frank Jr. (MD 1st), (202) 225-5311
McIntyre, Mike (NC 7th), (202) 225-2731
Marshall, Jim (GA 8th), (202) 225-6531
Matheson, Jim (UT 2nd), (202) 225-3011
Melancon, Charlie (LA 3rd), (202) 225-4031
Michaud, Michael H. (ME 2nd), (202) 225-6306
Minnick, Walt (ID 1st), (202) 225-6611
Mitchell, Harry E. (AZ 5th), (202) 225-2190
Moore, Dennis (KS 3rd), (202) 225-2865
Murphy, Patrick J. (PA 8th), (202) 225-4276
Nye, Glenn C. (VA 2nd), (202) 225-4215
Peterson, Collin C. (MN 7th), (202) 225-2165
Pomeroy, Earl (ND At Large), (202) 225-2611
Ross, Mike (AR 4th), (202) 225-3772
Salazar, John T. (CO 3rd), (202) 225-4761 Sanchez, Loretta (CA 47th), (202) 225-2965
Schiff, Adam B. (CA 29th), (202) 225-4176 Scott, David (GA 13th), (202) 225-2939
Shuler, Heath (NC 11th), (202) 225-6401
Space, Zachary T. (OH 18th), (202) 225-6265
Tanner, John S. (TN 8th), (202) 225-4714
Taylor, Gene (MS 4th), (202) 225-5772
Thompson, Mike (CA 1st), (202) 225-3311
Wilson, Charles (OH-06), (202) 225-5705
Thank you,
Deborah TeSelle
cell: 682-472-7013
dteselle@912ftw.org
Meetup: http://www.meetup.com/The912ProjectFortWorth/
Web: http://www.912ftw.org
Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/group.php?gid=56232744573
Twitter: http://www.twitter.com/912ftw
H
-
Comment by PAUL REVERE on November 5, 2009 at 3:34pm
- THIS WILL HELP GREATLY FOR US ALL TO FOCUS AT 10 PM TO THINK WE ARE GOING TO STOP THE ONE WORLD GOVERMENT AND AMERICA WILL STOP THE SOCIALIST AND THE AMERICAN PEOPLE WILL REGAIN CONTROL OF AMERICA PLEASE TELL EVERY YOU KNOW TO TAKE FIVE MINUTES OF THERE BUSY SCHEDULE TO DO THIS FOR ARE COUNTRY WE DONT ASK FOR BAD FOR ANY CERTAIN PERSON WE ASK GOD FOR THIS LITTLE REQUEST AND FOCUS ON SEEING THIS HAPPEN IN YOURE MIND WHEN YOU DO THIS REQUEST AMERICA AND YOURE FREEDOM IS WORTH IT THANK YOU PLEASE SPREAD THE WORD
TCUnation Links
TCUNation Shoppe
TCU Member Blogroll
Latest Activity
A Nation of Fools by Peary Perry
(sign up for new columns at www.pearyperry.com)
“Health Care Hookers Gone Wild!!!)
Donna Summer had a line in one of her songs that went like this… ‘I got what you want, you got what I need…beep, beep….’ This sho…
Oh! I'm sure we could start and lead our own campaign to help get this message out if they do, Mike! Like maybe using RICO against them: Repeal and Impeach Congress' Obamacare! (Or something like that).
Assault weapons are crucial for defense against terrorist forms of attack. But an 80% sniper fire war eliminates the commanders who control them. I have watched some videos of militia of late. A group of soldiers are shown. But in fact, groups are m…
BookNook
Badge
© 2010 Created by Earl B
You need to be a member of Mark Levin to add comments!