According to Jamie Weinstein at The Daily Caller, there is increasing evidence that the attack on the U.S. Embassy in Benghazi, Libya was coordinated and linked to al-Qaida.  Although the Obama Administration made a pathetic attempt at blaming the SEPTEMBER 11th ATTACK on an anti-Mohammed YouTube video, substantial evidence points to the culpability of the Obama Administration in failing to prevent the storming of the American Embassy.  World Net Daily  via Independent News reported on September 17 that American diplomats were warned of violent unrest in Benghazi at least three days prior to the killings of U.S. ambassador Christopher Stevens and three members of his team according to Libyan security officials. On September 10th, 2012, according to AFP, Al-Qaeda leader Ayman al-Zawahiri  released a video coinciding with the anniversary of the September 11, 2001

Ayman al-Zawahiri

Image by AFP

attacks, confirming for the first time the death of his deputy, Abu Yahya al-Libi was killed in a drone strike in Pakistan's Waziristan tribal area on June 4, according to SITE and IntelCenter.  According to the Daily Caller's Jamie Weinstein, al-Zawahiri said, “I celebrate with the Islamic nation, the holy warriors, the prince of the faithful Mullah Omar and the Muslims and jihadists in Libya, the news of the martyrdom of Libya’s lion.”

 As the days go by, substantial evidence points to the culpability of the Obama Administration, due to naivete', or sheer negligence as United States Secretary of State Hilary Clinton signed a document stating the Rules of Engagement in Libya that included a "no bullets policy". According to Michael Patrick Leahy at Breitbart.com, the United States State Department sought to hire a company to protect the United States Embassy in Libya that would be willing to agree with the "no bullets" Rules of Engagement for Libya that was signed by Clinton.  It was for this reason that there was no real chance for the Embassy to be defended successfully when it was overrun.  Ben Shapiro at Breitbart.com reported via Bret Baier at Fox News, that now it has come to light that intelligence sources believe that the mastermind of the al Qaeda attack on our Libyan consulate is one Sufyan Bin Qumu, a Taliban fighter who was captured in Pakistan, then turned over to the United

Image by TheObamaFile.com

States. Qumu was released from Guantanamo Bay in 2007 to the Qaddafi-led Libyan government.  In 2008, as the Qaddafi government tried to make amends with the Libyan rebels, Qumu was released. The Obama administration labeled him as an "ally" and as a leader of the Libyan rebels, head of the Darnah Brigade, Qumu received support from NATO.

Image by BusinessInsider.com

If the information from these reports is indeed true, then the blood of Americans is on the hands of Hillary Clinton and the Obama Administration.  It is puzzling that was not beefed up anyway just as a precautionary measure during the anniversary of the September 11 attacks that took place in 2001. In light of what has happened, it stifles the imagination that on Friday, September 21 according to Ramsey Cox at TheHill.com, Hillary Clinton stood on the Senate floor and with no limits to naivete', asked Congress to appropriate additional monies for Egypt, whose government is now controlled by the Muslim Brotherhood.  Kentucky Senator Rand Paul, using wisdom comparable to that of King Solomon, sternly knocked Hillary down to size while lecturing,“Hillary Clinton is here today asking for more money. While protesters storm our embassy and burn our flag, she’s asking for us to send more money to Egypt.”  It is apparent that the Obama Administration didn't learn anything from the $1.5 billion investment, in supporting the Muslim Brotherhood. Even more pathetic is the fact that in typical dishonest Oblamer fashion, the current administration tried to say that a complexly coordinated and extensively planned paramilitary operation was caused by a movie by Nakoula Basseley Nakoula. He was arrested in Cerritos, CA according to Sydney Lupkin at ABC News, because his involvement in the film may have been a violation of his probation, which barred him from either owning or using devices with access to the Web without prior approval from his probation officer.  Most likely, that charge is a cover for the Orwellian "thought crime" of speaking out against Islam and Shariah law, which are cherished by President Barack HUSSEIN Obama.

(HT: Jamie Weistein@The Daily Caller, AFP, Michael Patrick Leahy & Ben Shapiro@ Breitbart.com, Bret Baier@Fox News, World Net Daily, Ramsey Cox@TheHill.com, Andrew C. McCarthy@NationalReviewOnline, Steve@TCUNation.com, Sydney Lupkin@ ABC News,www.aclj.org)