social network for conservatives
John R. Houk
© October 7, 2012
Yesterday I cross posted a Fjordman article in which he talks about “Islamophobia” as the actual game plan of Islam rather than as an epithet used by Leftists and Muslim Apologists to propagandize that counterjihad writers are bigots and racists.
Today I am cross posting an Andrew Bostom article in which he demonstrates fear is the key portion of Islamic theology using warfare to acquire land and making that land Islamic.
Islam is the only world religion in which war and fear is a part of the theology specifically to spread Islam globally. Muslim Apologists love to point out that Judaism had a martial plan to take the Promised Land from the Canaanites; however that plan was localized was not to go beyond that physical land mass AND that conquest was not to spread Judaism but acquire the Land promised to Abraham. The timing of Jewish conquest of Canaanland coincided with the fullness of ungodly sin lived by those Canaanite nations.
The Islamic conquests of Christians, Jews, Hindus, Buddhists and Zoroastrian lands were not the result of moral turpitude of those religions. The people of non-Muslim theology had a moral line that made the Canaanite religion of sacrificing children and temple prostitution look Satanic. The great moral contrast between the above mentioned religions and Islam is that they refused to accept Mohammed and Allah willingly. Without accepting Islam - the Quran, Hadith and Sira - the death cult requires conquest until submission is attained. And friends this is the problem with Muslim dominated nations today. These folks still live with the concept of Islamic Supremacism with an inferior military to do the bidding of the Quran.
The new strategy of Islam via its purists is to use terrorism and infiltration to create a situation in which terrorism wears down the non-Muslim culture in preparation for a conquest.
Why should Westerners put up with that? Why should Americans put up with that?